Traylor v. Ellis et al
Plaintiff: Kenneth Traylor
Defendant: DHO Ms. Ellis, Superintendent Dixon and C/O Bishop
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Case Number: 3:2024cv00611
Filed: October 7, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Andrew S Harris
Referring Judge: Daniel P Jordan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: The Clerk is directed to mail to prisoner plaintiff a copy of notice of new law (PSP-1); Acknowledgment of Receipt and Certification (PSP-3); and form for voluntary dismissal (PSP-4). Plaintiff is directed to sign either the Acknowledgment (PSP-3) or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (PSP-4) and return to Clerk within 30 days of the date of this order or case may be dismissed without prejudice. Order with packet of forms mailed. Prisoner Petition Pleadings due by 11/27/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew S. Harris on 10/28/2024. (LAT)
October 7, 2024 Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kenneth Traylor. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAT)
October 7, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bishop, Dixon, Ellis, filed by Kenneth Traylor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Administrative Remedy Program Sensible Issue dated 5-12-24, #2 Exhibit B- Rule Violation Report dated 5-7-2024, #3 Exhibit C- Administrative Remedy Program First Step Response Form dated 9-9-24, #4 Exhibit D- Administrative Remedy Program Envelope, #5 Exhibit E- Anti-Harassment Standard Operating Procedure, #6 Exhibit F- Disciplinary Procedures Standard Operating Procedure, #7 Exhibit G- General Standards of Professional Conduct, #8 Envelope, #9 Notice of Assignment)(LAT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Traylor v. Ellis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Pro Se Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Traylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DHO Ms. Ellis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Superintendent Dixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C/O Bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?