Wilson et al v. Sauceda et al
| Lydarius Keith and Ze'Keyla Wilson |
| Samuel G. Sauceda and Strong Purple Logistics, Inc. |
| 3:2024cv00626 |
| October 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Andrew S Harris |
| Carlton W Reeves |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Strong Purple Logistics, Inc. (Strong, Jason) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) With Defenses by Strong Purple Logistics, Inc. (Strong, Jason) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Strong Purple Logistics, Inc. from Yazoo County Circuit Court, case number 82CI1:24-cv-00031. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMSSDC-5521410) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(PG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
