Young v. Stephenson et al
| Sylvester Young, Jr. |
| Frances Smith Stephenson, State of Mississippi and Bilbo Mitchell |
| 4:2008cv00092 |
| September 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Lauderdale |
| Linda R. Anderson |
| Tom S. Lee |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER: That the State of Mississippi, Frances Smith Stephenson and President of the Board of Supervisors are dismissed as defendants in this action. The plaintiff's claims concerning ineffective assistant of counsel against defendant Stephenson are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. The dismissal of this claim will count as a strike. The motion to vacate judgment filed as a response 25 is denied. The plaintiff within 20 days of the date of this order shall provide this court with the civil action number of every civil action or appeal which the plaintiff has had dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff shall also provide the name of the court and name(s) of defendant(s) in each civil action identified. That the United States District Clerk is hereby directed to issue summons to the defendant, Bilbo Mitchell, District Attorney. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 9/3/09 (PKM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
