Oliver v. Bankfirst et al
| William H. Oliver |
| Bankfirst and Bill Skinner |
| 4:2009cv00029 |
| March 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Real Property: Foreclosure Office |
| Noxubee |
| Linda R. Anderson |
| Tom S. Lee |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER ruling on Skinner's claims against Oliver; granting 64 Motion for Sanctions; finding as moot 65 Motion for Order on Bench Trial; denying 68 Motion for Permanent Injunction. Oliver is sanctioned $250. A final judgment will issue this day. Signed by District Judge Carlton W. Reeves on 2/22/2013. (AC)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; adopting 5 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff is ordered to pay the $350 filing fee by 8/21/09 or case is subject to dismissal as set out herein. Signed by District Judge Tom S. Lee on 6/8/09 (LWE)
|
|
Filing
5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: recommending that the 2 Motion and Supplemental Motion 4 for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by William H. Oliver be denied. Plaintiff shall pay filing fee on or before 8/21/2009 or his complaint may be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 6/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson on 5/20/09. (ACF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
