Lacour v. Claiborne County School District Board et al
| Daisy M. Lacour |
| Claiborne County School District Board and Annie Kilcrease |
| 5:2008cv00315 |
| November 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Claiborne |
| David C. Bramlette |
| John M. Roper |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL; case dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 1/28/10 (PKM)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting 49 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 57 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 61 Motion for Summary Judgment Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 12/28/09 (at)
|
|
Filing
29
AGREED ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL. Dr. Daisy M. Lacour's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is dismissed with prejudice, with each respective party being responsible for payment of their own costs and attorney's fees. This order does not impact the remaining claims of Dr. Daisy M. Lacour. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 3/30/2009 (dtj)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER denying 8 Motion for Entry of Default 10 Motion for Default Judgment. Further Ordered that the Clerk's Entry of Default 9 and Default Judgment 12 are vacated. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 12/17/08 (MGB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
