Law v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
Spencer D. Law |
Aetna Life Insurance Company and John and Jane Does 1-10 |
5:2009cv00116 |
July 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Western Office |
Adams |
David C. Bramlette |
John M. Roper |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER denying 41 Aetna's Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 15 Government's Motion to Dismiss.Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 9/26/11 (PL) |
Filing 40 CORRECTED ORDER re 39 Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, Order on Motion to Continue. This order corrects an error in the previous version and clarifies that parties have ten (10) days from the date of the original order to present argument, if any, for severance and transfer of the claims against the United States to the Court of Federal Claims. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 7/12/011 (nr) |
Filing 39 ORDER denying 28 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; deferring ruling on 15 Motion to Dismiss; denying 23 Motion to Continue. As addressed in the attached written order, all parties have 10 days from the date of this Order to present argument, if any for severance and transfer of the claims against the United States to the Court of Federal Claims. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 7/12/2011 (nr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.