Russell v. Epps et al
| Kevin Russell |
| Lisa Ramsey, George Davenport, Unknown Gallion, Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Robert Sturdivant and Darlester Foster |
| 5:2012cv00160 |
| November 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Western Office |
| Wilkinson |
| Robert H. Walker |
| David C. Bramlette |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
OPINION and ORDER. This case shall be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the orders of this Court. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on October 30, 2013. (lda)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER denying 33 Motion to reconsider. Plaintiff is warned that he has 15 days from the entry of this order to submit payment of the $350.00 filing fee plus the $50.00 administrative fee in this action or this action will be dismissed without further written notice to the Plaintiff. Plaintiff is given this final opportunity to comply with the order 32 entered on August 28, 2013. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on September 23, 2013 (lda)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. Plaintiff is granted 21 days from the entry of this order to pay to the clerk of court the requisite filing fee of $350.00 plus a $50.00 administrative fee. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on August 27, 2013. (lda)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
