Livingston v. Laughlin
Plaintiff: Donovan Anthony Livingston
Defendant: Vance Laughlin
Case Number: 5:2013cv00124
Filed: August 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Western Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: David C. Bramlette
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Memorandum Opinion and Order of Dismissal re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. This cause is dismissed with prejudice regarding the jurisdictional issue only and dismissed without prejudice in all other respects. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on September 9, 2013. (lda)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Livingston v. Laughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donovan Anthony Livingston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vance Laughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?