Mota v. Wagner et al
| Elvis Mota |
| Eric H. Holder, Jr., Barbara Wagner and Charles E. Samuels |
| 5:2013cv00234 |
| December 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Western Office |
| Adams |
| Michael T. Parker |
| David C. Bramlette |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND IMPOSITION OF MONETARY SANCTION. The repetitive claims presented in this habeas petition are deemed to be an abuse of the writ and this case will be dismissed with prejudice. Elvis Mota is required to pay a monetary sanction i n the amount of $500.00, payable to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, c/o Clerk of Court, 501 E. Court St., Suite 2.500, Jackson, MS 39201. Payment of this sanction is due immediately and should be accom panied by a cover letter clearly stating that the payment is for the sanction issued in civil action number 5:13-cv-234-DCB-MTP. Elvis Mota is cautioned that if future habeas petitions are repetitive or raise issues already decided by the Court, the se petitions will be found to be an abuse of the writ and will lead to the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to increased monetary fines and/or restrictions on his ability to file pro se actions in this Court. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on February 13, 2014. (lda)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
