Stanford v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.
Plaintiff: Tammy Stanford
Defendant: HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.
Case Number: 5:2014cv00026
Filed: March 14, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Western Office
County: Lincoln
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: David C. Bramlette
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting 5 Motion to Extend Deadline. Plaintiff shall have up to and including June 12, 2014 to file a Motion to Remand. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on April 3, 2014. (lda)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stanford v. HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Daniel Meyer
Represented By: Alan Daniel Leeth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Stanford
Represented By: Seth W. Shannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?