Williams v. Epps et al
Marcus D. Williams |
Christopher Epps, Management Training Corporation, Frank Shaw, Capt. Smith, D. Jones, Sgt. Ross, Officer Anthony, Officer Davis, J. Williams and McClain/Davis |
5:2014cv00052 |
June 30, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Western Office |
Lauderdale |
Michael T. Parker |
David C. Bramlette |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 71 Report and Recommendations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment 53 filed by Frank Shaw, Tommy Smith, Danny Jones, and Sarah Davis is GRANTED, and all claims against said d efendants are Dismissed With Prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims against defendants Delanie Ross and Latonia Anthony are dismissed for failure to state a claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this dismissal counts as a "third strike" against the plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Therefore, the Clerk of Court is directed to not accept any new complaint or petition from the plaintiff in any capacity until he has received written permission to file a complaint or petition, in advance, from a judicial officer in the Southern District of Mississippi. A final judgment dismissing this action in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall follow. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 3/17/2016 (ND) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.