Depaz-Lopez v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
| Jose Depaz-Lopez |
| Corrections Corporation of America, Jason Russell, Joseph Dimaria, Stacy Cook, Mark Wood and Adams County Health Service Department |
| 5:2015cv00089 |
| September 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Western Office |
| Adams |
| Michael T. Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER denying 63 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff has already filed written objections 59 on February 23, 2017 which were considered and overruled by the Court in its Order 61 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 3/20/2017 (dtj)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER ADOPTING 55 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims for damages are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's state law claims are dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 3/2/17. (RRL)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER ADOPTING 38 Report and Recommendations, denying 34 Motion to Amend/Correct filed by Jose Depaz-Lopez. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 8/17/16. (RRL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
