Easterling v. Natchez-Adams County School District
Plaintiff: Sue Ann Easterling
Defendant: Natchez-Adams County School District
Case Number: 5:2015cv00097
Filed: October 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Western Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: David C. Bramlette
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER granting 69 Motion in Limine Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 7/19/2017 (ECW)
June 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER denying 12 Motion to Dismiss Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 6/16/2016 (ECW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Easterling v. Natchez-Adams County School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sue Ann Easterling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Natchez-Adams County School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?