Gulf Restoration Network v. Town of Centreville, Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Gulf Restoration Network
Defendant:
Town of Centreville, Mississippi
Case Number:
5:2016cv00001
Filed:
January 5, 2016
Court:
Mississippi Southern District Court
Office:
Western Office
County:
XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge:
Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge:
David C. Bramlette
Nature of Suit:
Environmental Matters
Cause of Action:
33:1365
Jury Demanded By:
None
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gulf Restoration Network v. Town of Centreville, Mississippi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gulf Restoration Network | |
| Represented By: | Adam Babich - PHV |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Livingston de Calderon - PHV |
| Represented By: | Cynthia M. Sarthou |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Town of Centreville, Mississippi | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
