Chambliss et al v. Lincoln Motor Company et al
Chambliss, Malinda L. Chambliss, Oliver J. Chambliss, Jr., Garrvin Vondell Barnes, Jr., Koch Rashun Liggans and Octave Chambliss |
Lincoln Motor Company, Ford Motor Company and John Does 1-10 |
5:2016cv00125 |
December 15, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Western Office |
Claiborne |
David C Bramlette |
Michael T Parker |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Remark: Certified Copy of Remand Order mailed to Claiborne County Circuit Court. (MGB) |
![]() |
Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT of Malinda Chambliss by Garrvin Vondell Barnes, Jr, Malinda L. Chambliss, Octave Chambliss, Oliver J. Chambliss, Jr, Koch Rashun Liggans (Shannon, James) |
Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Oliver Chambliss by Garrvin Vondell Barnes, Jr, Malinda L. Chambliss, Octave Chambliss, Oliver J. Chambliss, Jr, Koch Rashun Liggans (Shannon, James) |
![]() |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by R. Gordon Sproule, Jr on behalf of Ford Motor Company (Sproule, R.) |
![]() |
Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Remand and Memorandum of Law in Support filed by Ford Motor Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Letter)(Gunn, George) |
Filing 10 AGREED ORDER granting ore tenus motion for extension of time to file response. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on January 30, 2017. (lda) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam D. Porter on behalf of Ford Motor Company (Porter, Adam) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Remand and Memorandum of Law in Support filed by Garrvin Vondell Barnes, Jr, Malinda L. Chambliss, Octave Chambliss, Oliver J. Chambliss, Jr, Koch Rashun Liggans (White, Kathryn) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Remand and Memorandum of Law in Support by Garrvin Vondell Barnes, Jr, Malinda L. Chambliss, Octave Chambliss, Oliver J. Chambliss, Jr, Koch Rashun Liggans (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(White, Kathryn) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION as to #5 : Memoranda in support should be filed separately and shown as a related document to the motion (Court's Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing Sec. 3.A.7). Attorney is directed to file the Memorandum as a separate document and link it to the appropriate document. (PKM) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing of Motion to Consolidate by Ford Motor Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Motion to Consolidate filed in 5:16-cv-126)(Gunn, George) |
Filing 3 State Court Record by Defendant Ford Motor Company (Gunn, George) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Ford Motor Company (Gunn, George) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ford Motor Company from Claiborne County Circuit Court, case number 2016-86. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 34643042647) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Copy of State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Letter to Ford, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(PKM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.