Birdie v. Brandi's Hope Community Services, LLC et al
Renza Birdie |
Brandi's Hope Community Services, LLC and Danny Cowart |
5:2017cv00021 |
February 24, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Western Office |
Adams |
Michael T. Parker |
David C. Bramlette |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 112 ORDER granting 110 joint motion to approve settlement and for dismissal. A final judgment dismissing this action with prejudice will follow in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on August 1, 2018 (JBR) |
Filing 78 ORDER granting 73 Joint Motion for Additional Distribution of Notice, signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on December 8, 2017 (JBR) |
Filing 21 ORDER Approving Notice and Consent. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 6/28/2017(EB) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting 11 Motion for Conditional Certification, for Approval and Distribution of Notice and for Disclosure of Contact Information. A collective class consisting of all Direct Support Professionals, or Direct Care Professionals, employed by Defendants Brandi's Hope Community Services, LLC, and Danny Cowart who stayed with a client overnight at any time since February 24, 2014, is conditionally certified. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 6/14/2017 (EB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.