McDonald-Elery v. Natchez-Adams School District
Plaintiff: Amy McDonald-Elery
Defendant: Natchez-Adams School District
Case Number: 5:2018cv00001
Filed: January 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Office: Western Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Michael T. Parker
Presiding Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/14/2018 (dtj)
February 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 2/12/2018 (dtj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McDonald-Elery v. Natchez-Adams School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy McDonald-Elery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Natchez-Adams School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?