Avila v. Julian
| Gonzalo Garcia Avila |
| S. Julian |
| Pro Se Department |
| 5:2018cv00077 |
| July 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Western Office |
| Adams |
| David C Bramlette |
| Michael T Parker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT. IT IS, HEREBY, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this cause is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 8/27/18 (VM) |
| Filing 4 Memorandum Opinion and Order of Dismissal re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this cause should be and is hereby dismissed without prejudice. A separate final judgment shall issue pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Honorable David C. Bramlette, III on 8/27/18 (VM) |
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM I IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gonzalo Garcia Avila (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Supplement Documents from Original 7/18/18 Filing, #3 Envelope)(VM) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gonzalo Garcia Avila. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(VM) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5 receipt number 34643051004), filed by Gonzalo Garcia Avila. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) #2 Notice of Assignment) (VM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
