JOHNSON v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI et al
BRANDON JOHNSON |
Mississippi Department of Corrections, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and WCCF SECURITY STAFF |
Pro Se Department |
5:2019cv00078 |
August 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
David C Bramlette |
Michael T Parker |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
Filing 8 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and Amendments to MCA 47-5-138, filed by BRANDON JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ND) |
|
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of District of Columbia; Case Number 1:19-cv-01510. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 4 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by BRANDON JOHNSON (zrdj) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 8/23/2019.] |
|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, WCCF SECURITY STAFF filed by BRANDON JOHNSON.(zeg) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 8/23/2019.] |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 05/22/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zeg) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 8/23/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.