Singh v. Wolf et al
Yadwinder Singh |
Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf, Stanley Crockett, Ken Cuccinelli, William P. Barr and Warden Shawn Gillis |
5:2020cv00016 |
January 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
David C Bramlette |
Michael T Parker |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MOTION for Hillary Gaston Walsh to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number 0538-4196628) by Yadwinder Singh (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Bar of Nevada - Certificate of Good Standing)(Nguyen, Ammie) |
Filing 2 EMERGENCY MOTION to Stay Removal by Yadwinder Singh (PKM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 34643058156.), filed by Yadwinder Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Credible Fear Interview Notes, #2 Exhibit B - Email, #3 Exhibit C - Information re: Department of Asian Studies, #4 Exhibit D - Affidavit of Mother, #5 Exhibit E - Affidavit of Father, #6 Exhibit F - Affidavit of Uncle, #7 Exhibit G - Letter Dated July 27, 2019, #8 Exhibit H - Affidavit of Namberdar, #9 Exhibit I - Affidavit of Witness, #10 Exhibit J - MRI Information, #11 Exhibit K - Affidavit of Witness, #12 Exhibit L - Affidavit, #13 Exhibit M - Affidavit, #14 Exhibit N - Information from Deep General & Maternity Hospital, #15 Exhibit O - Passport, #16 Civil Cover Sheet)(PKM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.