Foster v. Gillis
Sean Jonathan Foster |
Shawn R. Gillis |
Pro Se Department |
5:2020cv00143 |
June 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Michael T Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Mootness by Shawn R. Gillis (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Jose Benavidez)(Paige-Federal Gov, Mitzi) |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Civil Process Clerk, as to Shawn R. Gillis served on 7/6/2020, answer due 7/27/2020. (PG) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Attorney General of the United States, as to Shawn R. Gillis served on 7/2/2020, answer due 7/22/2020. (PG) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable as to #2 Order,. Mail sent to Sean Jonathan Foster (PG) |
Filing 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Warden Shawn R. Gillis served on 6/29/2020, answer due 7/20/2020. (PG) |
Filing 2 ORDER, Respondent Gillis shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within twenty (20) days of the service of a copy of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 6/25/2020. [Copy of Order mailed to petitioner] (LDR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 34643059775.), filed by Sean Jonathan Foster. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Assignment, #2 Envelope)(PG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.