Vantsian v. Gillis et al
| Alexsi Vantsian |
| Warden Shawn R. Gillis and Pro Se Department |
| 5:2020cv00169 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Michael T Parker |
| Keith Starrett |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Mootness by Shawn R. Gillis (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Anthony Piccirillo)(Paige-Federal Gov, Mitzi) |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Attorney General of the United States as to Shawn R. Gillis served on 9/29/2020, answer due 10/19/2020. (VM) |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Shawn R. Gillis served on 9/28/2020, answer due 10/19/2020. (VM) |
| Filing 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed by Civil Process Clerk, as to Shawn R. Gillis served on 9/25/2020, answer due 10/15/2020. (VM) |
Filing 2
ORDER, Respondent Shawn Gillis shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in this case within 20 days of the service of a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 9/24/2020. [Copy mailed to petitioner] (LDR)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5 receipt number 34643060550.), filed by Vantsian Alexsi. (Attachments: #1 Notice declining parole, #2 Envelope, #3 Notice of Assignment)(VM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
