Ramos-Quinones v. Gillis
Gerardo Ramos-Quinones |
Shawn R. Gillis |
Pro Se Department |
5:2020cv00193 |
October 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Michael T Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Warden, Adams County Correctional Center, served on 12/8/2020, answer due 12/28/2020. (PG) |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Civil Process Clerk as to Office of the U.S. Attorney, served on 12/8/2020, answer due 12/28/2020. (PG) |
Filing 3 ORDER, Respondent Warden of Adams County Correctional Center shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within twenty (20) days of the service of a copy of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 12/03/2020. [Copy of Order mailed to Petitioner] (CS) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 34643061246 (PG) |
Filing 2 ORDER, on or before November 16, 2020, petitioner shall complete and file the attached application or pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 10/15/2020. [Copy mailed to petitioner] (LDR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Gerardo Ramos-Quinones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(PG) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/14/2020: #2 Notice of Assignment) (PG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.