Molina-Marquez v. Gillis
Samuel Molina-Marquez |
Shawn R. Gillis |
Pro Se Department |
5:2020cv00196 |
October 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
Michael T Parker |
Keith Starrett |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Shawn R. Gillis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration)(Nobile-Federal Gov, Emily) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Shawn R. Gillis (Attorney General of the United States) served on 11/9/2020, answer due 11/30/2020. (PKM) |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Shawn R. Gillis (Civil Process Clerk) served on 10/28/2020, answer due 11/17/2020. (PKM) |
Filing 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Shawn R. Gillis (Warden, Adams County Correctional Center) served on 10/28/2020, answer due 11/17/2020. (PKM) |
Filing 2 ORDER, Respondent Warden of Adams County Correctional Center shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within twenty (20) days of the service of a copy of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 10/26/2020. [Copy of Order mailed to petitioner] (LDR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 34643061170.), filed by Samuel Molina-Marquez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Notice of Assignment)(PKM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.