Thomas v. Groom et al
Plaintiff: James Lee Thomas
Defendant: Jane Doe, John Doe, James Burkes, John or Jane Doe and Mary Groom
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Case Number: 5:2020cv00211
Filed: November 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Taylor B McNeel
Referring Judge: Michael T Parker
2 Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2020 Filing 7 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis re #2 RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by James Lee Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAT)
December 28, 2020 Filing 6 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Prisoner Litigation Reform Act and Amendments to MCA 47-5-138 as to #3 Order Opsp2, Acknowledgement filed by James Lee Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAT)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to District Judge Taylor B. McNeel for all further proceedings. District Judge Keith Starrett no longer assigned to case Signed by Chief District Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III on 12/18/20 (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MGB)
December 18, 2020 Attorneys are advised to include the case number and new judge assignment of 5:20cv211TBM-MTP on future filed pleadings. (MGB)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: on or before 12/17/2020, plaintiff shall either pay the required filing fee or file a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, specifically the section entitled Certificate to Be Completed by Authorized Officer of prisoner accounts or file an affidavit specifically stating the name of the prison official contacted concerning the Certificate and why this information is not provided to this court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 11/17/2020. [Copy of Order mailed to Plaintiff] (CS)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: The Clerk is directed to mail to prisoner plaintiff a copy of notice of new law (PSP-1); Acknowledgment of Receipt and Certification (PSP-3); and form for voluntary dismissal (PSP-4). Plaintiff is directed to sign either the Acknowledgment (PSP-3) or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (PSP-4) and return to Clerk within 30 days of the date of this order or case may be dismissed without prejudice. Order with packet of forms mailed to Plaintiff. Prisoner Petition Pleadings due by 12/17/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker on 11/17/2020. (CS)
November 16, 2020 Filing 2 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by James Lee Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LAT)
November 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Burkes, Jane Doe(Correctional Officer; Individual capacity and Official capacity), Jane Doe(Chief Medical Personnel; Individual capacity and Official capacity), John Doe(Correctional Officer "Srt"; Individual capacity and Official capacity), John Doe(Warden; Individual capacity and Official capacity), John Doe(Deputy Warden; Individual capacity and Official capacity), John or Jane Doe, John or Jane Doe, Mary Groom, filed by James Lee Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit F- Wilkinson County Correctional Facility Inmate Handbook, #2 Envelope, #3 Notice of Assignment)(NEFs and notice of assignment mailed to Plaintiff.)(LAT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Groom et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Lee Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Burkes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John or Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Groom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Pro Se Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?