Sanders v. Huffman
Plaintiff: Chad R. Sanders
Defendant: Brand Huffman
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Case Number: 5:2021cv00102
Filed: December 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Robert P Myers
Referring Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2022 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Lynn Fitch, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, served on 1/31/2022, answer due 2/22/2022. (ND)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER, Respondent, through the Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in this cause within twenty (20) days of the service upon the said Attorney General of a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr. on 01/27/2022. (CS)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER *RESTRICTED* granting #3 , #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr. on 01/27/2022. (CS)
January 12, 2022 Filing 5 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Chad R. Sanders. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ND)
December 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: on or before 1/13/2022, plaintiff shall either pay the required filing fee or file a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, specifically the section entitled Certificate to Be Completed by Authorized Officer of prisoner accounts or file an affidavit specifically stating the name of the prison official contacted concerning the Certificate and why this information is not provided to this court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert P. Myers, Jr. on 12/14/2021. (CS)
December 13, 2021 Filing 3 *RESTRICTED* MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Chad R. Sanders. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ND)
December 13, 2021 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Chad R. Sanders. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ND)
December 13, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Chad R. Sanders. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Envelope, #10 Notice of Assignment)(ND)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanders v. Huffman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chad R. Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brand Huffman
Represented By: Lynn Fitch-State Gov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Pro Se Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?