Cooperstein v. Siper et al
Plaintiff: Corie Beth Cooperstein and Aaron Mark Feldman
Defendant: Stephanie Siper and John Does 1-10
Case Number: 5:2022cv00093
Filed: November 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Bradley W Rath
Referring Judge: Keith Starrett
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2023 Filing 14 Letter to Chancery Clerk of Lincoln County, Mississippi from Clerk, U.S. District Court transmitting certified copy of Remand Order and docket sheet. (cwl)
January 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Memorandum Opinion and Order, granting re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court. This case in its entirety is hereby remanded to the Chancery Court of Lincoln County. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 1/13/2023 (cwl)
January 10, 2023 Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #10 Response in Opposition to Motion, #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Corie Beth Cooperstein, Aaron Mark Feldman (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Merrill Lynch account records)(Anderson, Michael)
January 3, 2023 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #10 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Stephanie Siper (Morrison, Walter)
January 3, 2023 Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Stephanie Siper (Morrison, Walter)
December 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER setting briefing schedule re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Aaron Mark Feldman, Corie Beth Cooperstein. Signed by District Judge Keith Starrett on 12/28/2022. (lm)
December 23, 2022 ***Hearings terminated. In light of the Text Only Order staying proceedings entered 12/22/2022, the Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 1/10/2023 before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath is hereby CANCELLED. (AB)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER staying proceedings. A #7 Motion to Remand has been filed. Pursuant to Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1), the attorney conference, disclosure requirements, and all discovery are stayed, pending the Court's ruling on the #7 Motion. NO FURTHER WRITTEN ORDER SHALL ISSUE FROM THIS COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 12/22/2022 (TS)
December 21, 2022 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Corie Beth Cooperstein, Aaron Mark Feldman (Anderson, Michael)
December 21, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Corie Beth Cooperstein, Aaron Mark Feldman (Anderson, Michael)
December 5, 2022 Filing 6 State Court Record by Defendant Stephanie Siper (Morrison, Walter)
December 5, 2022 Filing 5 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 1/10/2023 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath. (AB)
December 2, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Roy H. Liddell on behalf of Corie Beth Cooperstein, Aaron Mark Feldman (Liddell, Roy)
December 2, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael D. Anderson on behalf of Corie Beth Cooperstein, Aaron Mark Feldman (Anderson, Michael)
November 23, 2022 Filing 2 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Stephanie Siper.(Morrison, Walter)
November 21, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Stephanie Siper from Chancery - Lincoln, case number 22-CV-00396.. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BMSSDC-4987332) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(cwl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cooperstein v. Siper et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Corie Beth Cooperstein
Represented By: R. David Marchetti
Represented By: Michael D. Anderson
Represented By: Roy H. Liddell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron Mark Feldman
Represented By: R. David Marchetti
Represented By: Michael D. Anderson
Represented By: Roy H. Liddell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephanie Siper
Represented By: Walter C. Morrison, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?