Bridgewater v. John N. John Truckline, Inc. et al
| Keith Bridgewater |
| John N. John Truckline, Inc. and Daniel Edward James Lewis |
| 5:2024cv00031 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi |
| Bradley W Rath |
| Keith Starrett |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Rule 16(a) Initial Order: Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 7/22/2024 at 1:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath. (AB) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by John N. John Truckline, Inc., Daniel Edward James Lewis.(Berry, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Hamilton C. Armour on behalf of John N. John Truckline, Inc., Daniel Edward James Lewis (Armour, Hamilton) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keith Bridgewater. John N. John Truckline, Inc. served on 4/30/2024, answer due 5/21/2024. (Berry, Kelley) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to John N. John Truckline, Inc. (LAT) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Daniel Edward James Lewis. (LAT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against John N. John Truckline, Inc., Daniel Edward James Lewis ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMSSDC-5370217), filed by Keith Bridgewater. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
