Collins v. MOR PPM, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Rochelle Collins
Defendant: MOR PPM, Inc. and Gordon Edward Lee
Case Number: 5:2024cv00050
Filed: May 17, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: David C Bramlette
Referring Judge: Bradley W Rath
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2024 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #3 Unopposed Motion to Reopen and/or Extend Deadline to File Answer. The deadline for MOR PPM, Inc., and Gordon Edward Lee to file an answer or other responsive pleading is 7/22/2024. NO FURTHER ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath on 7/15/24 (HM)
July 12, 2024 Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION to Reopen Case , MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by MOR PPM, Inc. (Buffington, C.)
July 11, 2024 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath: Telephonic Status Conference held on 7/11/2024. PARTICIPANTS: Joe N. Tatum (counsel for Plaintiff Rochelle Collins); C. Phillip Buffington, Jr., and Demarcus R. McGee (counsel for Defendants MOR PPM, Inc., and Gordon Edward Lee). The Court discussed the status of the pleadings. (HM)
July 10, 2024 Set Hearings: Telephone Conference set for 7/11/2024 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath. Plaintiff's counsel will place the call to Judge Rath's Chambers (228-563-1755) with Defendants' counsel on the line. (HM)
May 29, 2024 Filing 2 State Court Record by Defendants Gordon Edward Lee, MOR PPM, Inc. Volumes 1-1 (Buffington, C.)
May 17, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Gordon Edward Lee, MOR PPM, Inc. from Amite County Circuit Court, MS, case number 24-cv-26-B. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMSSDC-5409327) If the complete state court record is not attached as an Exhibit to the Petition for Removal, pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. MOR PPM, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MOR PPM, Inc.
Represented By: C. Phillip Buffington, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gordon Edward Lee
Represented By: C. Phillip Buffington, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rochelle Collins
Represented By: Joe N. Tatum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?