Polesky et al v. Morrison et al.
| Steven G. Polesky and Leann J. Polesky |
| Michael Bloom, Roberta Cross Guns, Does, Julie Gunlock and John Morrison |
| 1:2007cv00042 |
| March 23, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Billings Office |
| DAWSON |
| Richard F. Cebull |
| Carolyn S Ostby |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 64 Findings and Recommendations, 35 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Bloom, Julie Gunlock. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bloom and Gunlock's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 35) is GRANTED. PLEASE READ ORDER FOR SPECIFICS. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 1/16/2009. (AMC, ) Modified on 1/16/2009 indicate a copy mailed to D. Wright, all others received notification through email(AMC, ).
|
|
Filing
64
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Bloom, Julie Gunlock. Objections to F&R due by 10/20/2008. Signed by Magistrate Carolyn S Ostby on 10/1/2008. HARD COPY MAILED TO R. ALLEN BECK AND DAVID WRIGHT. (JDH)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 Findings and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Ostby. 6 Motion to Dismiss filed by State of Montana. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 3/25/2008. (CAA, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
