White v. 16th District Court et al
Joel Miles White |
16th District Court, Mike Ferriter, Lisa Grady, Sam Law and Mike Mahoney |
1:2009cv00165 |
December 23, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Billings Office |
YELLOWSTONE |
Richard F. Cebull |
Carolyn S Ostby |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER denying 7 MOTION to Remove Strike. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 10/9/2013. Mailed to White. (TAG, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 in full. White's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and his Complaint 2 is DISMISSED. The dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), and the Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 2/5/2010. Copy mailed to White. (TAG, ) |
Filing 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma Pauperis, 2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner filed by Joel Miles White. White's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis should be DENIED and his Complaint DISMISSED. The dismissal sho uld count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the Court should certify that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Objections to F&R due by 2/1/2010. Signed by Magistrate Carolyn S Ostby on 1/14/2010. Copy mailed to White. (TAG, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.