PlainsBull Martin v. Black Eagle et al
| Karmelita PlainsBull Martin |
| Cedric Black Eagle, Coolidge Jefferson, Scott Russell and Darren Old Coyote |
| 1:2010cv00017 |
| February 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Billings Office |
| YELLOWSTONE |
| Richard F. Cebull |
| Carolyn S Ostby |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 in full. 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Karmelita PlainsBull Martin is DENIED and the matter DISMISSED. The Court certifies pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A) Fed.R.Civ.P. that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 3/26/2010. Copy mailed to PlainsBull Martin. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
4
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner filed by Karmelita PlainsBull Martin. Plains Bull Martin's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis should be DENIED and this matter DISMISS ED for failure to state a federal claim, and the docket should reflect that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Objections to F&R due by 3/25/2010. Signed by Magistrate Carolyn S Ostby on 3/8/2010. Copy mailed to Plains Bull Martin. (TAG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
