Lyda v. Shinseki

Plaintiff: Robin O. Lyda
Defendant: Eric K. Shinseki
Case Number: 1:2012cv00049
Filed: April 18, 2012
Court: Montana District Court
Office: Billings Office
County: CUSTER
Presiding Judge: Richard F. Cebull
Referring Judge: Carolyn S Ostby
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 3, 2012 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 in full. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 1 is DENIED. Lyda has thirty days from the entry of this Order to pay the full filing fee of $350.00. If she fails to do so, the Clerk of Court will be ordered to close the file. Signed by Judge Richard F. Cebull on 5/3/2012. Mailed to Lyda. (TAG, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lyda v. Shinseki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robin O. Lyda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric K. Shinseki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.