Hein et al v. United States of America et al
| William Hein and Arlene Hein |
| United States of America, Department of the Interior, State of Montana and All Other Persons Unknown |
| 1:2014cv00055 |
| April 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Billings Office |
| YELLOWSTONE |
| Carolyn S Ostby |
| Susan P. Watters |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2409 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of United States of America against Estate of William Hein, Arlene Hein (AMC)
|
|
Filing
45
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL. DENYING in part and GRANTING in part 36 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. READ ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 1/6/2016. (AMC, )
|
|
Filing
44
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the United States motion to dismiss (ECF 36 ) be DENIED to the extent it seeks dismissal based on Rule 12(b)(1), but GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal based on Rule 12(b)(6), with leave to amend. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn S Ostby on 11/18/2015. (JDR, )
|
|
Filing
23
OPINION AND ORDER adopting 21 Findings and Recommendations IN FULL. The State of Montana's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff William and Arlein Hein's motion for certification of state law is DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 1/12/2015. (EMH, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
