Osborne et al v. Billings Clinic et al
Dale Osborne and Kelly Osborne |
Billings Clinic |
Billings Clinic |
United States of America |
1:2014cv00126 |
September 16, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Billings Office |
YELLOWSTONE |
Susan P. Watters |
Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 79 Motion to Compel and DENYING 97 Motion to Supplement AS MOOT. Sanctions and attorney's fees are denied. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 4/13/2015. (EMH, ) |
Filing 89 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion to Compel discovery. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 3/26/2015. (EMH, ) |
Filing 82 ORDER DENYING 49 Motion for Court Order Lifting Any Restrictions on Sharing Depositions and Fruits of Discovery. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 3/9/2015. (EMH, ) |
Filing 78 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 44 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Billings Clinic AND DENYING 51 MOTION for Leave to File Under Seal Billings Clinic Policies filed by Dale Osborne AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 2/27/2015. (EMH, ) |
Filing 45 OPINION and ORDER denying 34 Motion for Court's Order Permitting More than Ten Depositions and Setting Depositions of Billings Clinic Agents and Employees. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 1/12/2015. (EMH, ) |
Filing 28 ORDER denying 16 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 12/1/2014. (EMH, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.