Wittman et al v. CB1, Inc.
| William Wittman and Amber Bellamy |
| CB1, Inc. |
| 1:2015cv00105 |
| October 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Billings Office |
| YELLOWSTONE |
| Carolyn S Ostby |
| Susan P. Watters |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
FINAL APPROVAL ORDER- Read order for details Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 5/24/2017. (AMC)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. ; adopting Findings and Recommendations re 33 Findings and Recommendations.; denying 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 6/1/2016. (SLL, )
|
|
Filing
33
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by CB1, Inc. IT IS RECOMMENDED that CB1's motion to dismiss and strike class allegations be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn S Ostby on 4/8/2016. (JDR, ) Modified on 4/8/2016 to add text and regenerate NEF (JDR, ).
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE; denying 16 Motion REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE; granting 21 Motion for Hearing. The Court will hear oral argument on the motion to dismiss on Friday, March 25, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn S Ostby on 2/18/2016. (JDR, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
