Jones v. Schaps et al
| Garry L. Jones |
| Nicholas R. Schaps, II, TN Transport, Inc. and J&S Energy, LLC |
| TN Transport, Inc., Nicholas R. Schaps, II and J&S Energy, LLC |
| Garry L. Jones |
| 1:2017cv00014 |
| August 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Billings Office |
| MISSOULA |
| Susan P. Watters |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 1/26/2018. (JEC)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER, On December 15, 2017, the Court ordered the parties to file a stipulation to dismiss together with a proposed order dismissing the case within thirty days (Doc. 38). No stipulation having been filed as of today's date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties file a joint stipulation showing cause why no such stipulation to dismiss has been filed by Monday, January 29, 2018. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 1/22/2018. (EMH)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff Garry L. Jones' motion to admit Andrew P. Muller to appear pro hac vice (Doc. 14) is GRANTED and he is authorized to appear as counsel with David R. Paoli pursuant to L.R. 83.1 (d) in the above captioned matter. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 3/17/2017. (Copy Order with CMRCF registration letter mailed to PHV atty Muller) (PHV notification to S.N and K.H in Msla) (EMH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
