Boulter v. The Hartford Fire Insurance Company et al
| Donald Boulter |
| The Hartford Fire Insurance Company and John Does I-V |
| 1:2017cv00068 |
| May 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Billings Office |
| YELLOWSTONE |
| Timothy J. Cavan |
| Susan P. Watters |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER granting 27 Motion for Attorney Fees. The parties have stipulated that the Court should award Boutler $45,000.00 in attorney fees (Doc. 32). Boulter is awarded $45,000.00 is attorney fees. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 8/14/2018. (EMH)
|
|
Filing
25
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Donald Boulter against John Does I-V, The Hartford Fire Insurance Company. (EMH)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Consent to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge having been either withheld or met with objection, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The case remains assigned to the Honorable Susan P. Watters, United States District Judge, for all further proceedings and entry of judgment. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(l)(B), the case is referred to the Honorable Timothy J. Cavan, United States Magistrate Judge, who will conduct all necessary hearings and submit to the undersigned proposed findings of fact andrecommendations for the disposition of all motions excepted from the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction by 28 U.S.C. §636(b )(1 )(A). Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 6/7/2017. (AMC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
