Eaton v. Montana Silversmiths
Robert A. Eaton |
Montana Silversmiths |
1:2018cv00065 |
April 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Billings Office |
STILLWATER |
Timothy J. Cavan |
Susan P. Watters |
Other Labor Litigation |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 158 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Montana Silversmiths against Robert A. Eaton. (copy mailed to Eaton) (AMC) |
Filing 131 ORDER DENYING 120 Motion to Certify Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 2/1/2022. (copy mailed to Eaton) (AMC) |
Filing 118 ORDER CLARIFYING PRIOR ORDER AND DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. IT IS ORDERED that Eaton's Motion (Doc. 114) is DENIED insofar as it is an objection and is DENIED to the extent it is a Motion for Reconsideration. Montana Silversmith's Motion to Strike (Doc. 115) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 11/1/2021. (copy mailed to R. Eaton) (AMC) |
Filing 113 IT IS ORDERED that Montana Silversmiths' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 94) is DENIED with respect to Eaton's claim for retaliation based upon his 2017 performance evaluation and GRANTED as to all remaining claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Eaton's Motion to Extend Motion to Compel Deadline (Doc. 97) and his Motion for Hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. 109) are DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 9/28/2021. (copy mailed to Eaton) (AMC) |
Filing 110 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL AND GRANTING 54 Motion to Dismiss. COUNT 7 OF EATON'S 4TH AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 3/1/2021. (Copy mailed to Eaton) (AMC) |
Filing 74 ORDERED: Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (Doc. 59) is DENIED as moot. The parties will perform pursuant to the agreement reached during the hearing and entered on the record in open court. Copy mailed to plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 5/13/2020. (HEG) Modified on 5/13/2020: mailed to Eaton (TAG). |
Filing 58 ORDER denying 56 Motion to Compel. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 56) is DENIED with leave to renew. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 1/29/2020. (JDR) Modified on 1/29/2020: hard copy mailed to pro se plaintiff (JDR). |
Filing 53 ORDER DENYING ENTRY OF STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Joint Stipulated Protective Order (Doc. 52) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 1/22/2020. (HEG) Modified on 1/22/2020 copy mailed to plaintiff(HEG). |
Filing 33 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS ORDERED that the proposed 31 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS entered by the United States Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's 16 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) is GRANTED as to Counts 3 through 6 and DENIED as to Counts 1 and 2 of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Counts 3 through 6 of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his complaint until September 30, 2019. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 9/10/2019. (copy mailed to pro se party Eaton) (EMH) |
Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL 28 Findings and Recommendations. GRANTING AS TO COUNTS 3 TO 6 AND DENIED AS TO COUNTS 1 AND 2 OF PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT inre 16 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his complaint until August 26, 2019. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 8/6/2019. (AMC) Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff. |
Filing 19 ORDER. Consent to the jurisdiction of the U. S. Magistrate Judge having been either withheld or met with objection, this case remains ASSIGNED to the Honorable Susan P. Watters and is REFERRED to the Honorable Timothy J. Cavan. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 11/28/2018. (JDR) |
Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL AND DENYING 8 Motion for Entry of Default. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 10/16/2018. (Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff) (AMC) |
Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered by the United States Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to P roceed in forma pauperis and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed ti close this case, unless, within 30 days of today's date, Eaton pays the full $400.00 filing fee to the Clerk of Court. If Eaton pays the full fee as permitted herein, the Clerk of Court should file the lodged Complaint 2 . Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 5/22/2018. (copy mailed to pro se party Eaton) (EMH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Eaton v. Montana Silversmiths | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert A. Eaton | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Montana Silversmiths | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.