Leyva v. Guyer et al
| Anthony Joe Leyva |
| Lynn Guyer and Tim Fox |
| 1:2018cv00179 |
| December 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Timothy J Cavan |
| Susan P Watters |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner Anthony Joe Leyva. Motions referred to Timothy J. Cavan. (TAG) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time. Response shall be filed on or before Thursday, March 7, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 1/17/2019. Mailed to Leyva (TAG)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #3 Order to Show Cause by Petitioner Anthony Joe Leyva. Motions referred to Timothy J. Cavan. (TAG) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #1 -1 Motion to Appoint Counel. Show Cause Response due by 2/7/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 1/7/2019. Mailed to Leyva (TAG)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Anthony Joe Leyva. Motions referred to Timothy J. Cavan. (Attachments: #1 Account Statement) (TAG) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 not paid), filed by Anthony Joe Leyva. (Attachments: #1 Letter) (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
