Ryan v. Saul
| Jaime Frances Ryan |
| Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Saul |
| 1:2019cv00061 |
| June 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Timothy J Cavan |
| Susan P Watters |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Clerk's Notice Upon Consent to USMJ. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan (JDR) |
| Filing 5 CONSENTS TO USMJ. (JDR) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Mailing of Consent Magistrate Judge as Presiding Judge. Mailed to counsel Victoria L. Francis, Heather L. Griffith, John E. Seidlitz, Jr. Consent/Objection to USMJ Form due by 7/26/2019. (JEC) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather L. Griffith on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Griffith, Heather) |
| Andrew Saul added to case as Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Nancy A. Berryhill (Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration) terminated. (CDH) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Originals handed back to Seidlitz.) (JDR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Jaime Frances Ryan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (JDR) |
| Filing fee received: $ 400, receipt number MTX400013645 (JDR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
