Guthridge v. Johnson & Johnson Corp et al
1:2022cv00145 |
December 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Billings Office |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled cause is DISMISSEDWITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 4/18/2024. (AMC) |
Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL for 31 Findings and Recommendations, 22 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Johnson & Johnson Corp, Ethicon, Inc. GRANTED AS FOLLOWS, Count III is dismissed without pr ejudice and with leave to amend. Count IV is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. If Guthridge wishes to proceed on Counts III and IV, she must file an amended complaint by November 1, 2023. Signed by Judge Susan P. Watters on 10/11/2023. (AMC) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting 14 Motion to Change Venue. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 12/19/2022. (KAH) Modified on 12/19/2022 to reflect emailed sent to Billings division (KAH). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Guthridge v. Johnson & Johnson Corp et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.