Maxum Indemnity Company v. Mount Zion et al
Plaintiff: Maxum Indemnity Company
Defendant: Mount Zion, Boles Custom Builders and Sunrise Ridge Condominiums Owners Association
Case Number: 2:2017cv00055
Filed: August 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Butte Office
County: GALLATIN
Presiding Judge: Brian Morris
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. It is hereby ordered that this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 9/24/2018. (NOS)
April 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the STAY in this case is continued. The parties will file a joint status report with the Court on or before May 4, 2018. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 4/16/2018. (NOS)
April 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting 19 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jeremy S. Macklin for Maxum Indemnity Company. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due within 15 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 4/10/2018. (NOS)
November 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting 15 Motion to Stay. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. All proceedings are STAYED until further Order of the Court. 2. Cnsl will submit a joint or separate report to the Court by 3/2/18 informing the Court of the status of the settlement in the underlying litigation, its approval and the appropriateness of resumption of these proceedings. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 11/28/2017. (ELL)
August 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting 3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice ; granting 4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 9/12/2017. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 8/28/2017. (ELL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maxum Indemnity Company v. Mount Zion et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maxum Indemnity Company
Represented By: Robert M. Carlson
Represented By: Julie K. Klein
Represented By: Michael S. Knippen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mount Zion
Represented By: Robert M. Carlson
Represented By: Julie K. Klein
Represented By: Michael S. Knippen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boles Custom Builders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sunrise Ridge Condominiums Owners Association
Represented By: Robert M. Carlson
Represented By: Julie K. Klein
Represented By: Michael S. Knippen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?