Howard et al v. Interstate Distributor Co. et al
| Sharon Howard and Frank Howard |
| Interstate Distributor Co., Charles Brown and John Does 1 through 10 |
| 2:2018cv00014 |
| February 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Butte Office |
| SILVER BOW |
| Sam E Haddon |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER of DISMISSAL with PREJUDICE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action be dismissed on the merits, with prejudice, as fully and finally compromised, each party to pay their own costs. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/4/2019. (NOS)
|
|
Filing
12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 6/15/2018. Discovery due by 12/21/2018. Motions due by 2/22/2019. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4/26/2019. (See Order for additional schedule dates.) Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 5/3/2018. (NOS)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDERED: Plaintiffs shall file an amended preliminary pretrial statement, addressing with strict compliance each matter listed in L.R. 16.2(b)(l)(D), (F), (G), and (J) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(i) on or before May 1, 2018. Failure to file an amended preliminary pretrial statement in full compliance with the terms of this Order could result, without motion, in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/27/2018. (HEG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
