2-Bar Ranch Limited Partnership et al v. United States Forest Service et al
2-Bar Ranch Limited Partnership, Broken Circle Ranch Company, Inc. and R Bar N Ranch, LLC |
United States Forest Service, Sonny Perdue, Victoria Christiansen, Leanne Marten, Melany Glossa and Cameron Rasor |
2:2018cv00033 |
May 31, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Butte Office |
POWELL |
Sam E Haddon |
Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 84 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants' and against Plaintiffs.. (HEG) |
Filing 73 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk on 3/26/2019. (HEG) |
Filing 61 ORDERED: A-78, B-63, B-67, C-64, E-74, E-81, and E-85 are stricken from theadministrative record re 51 . The Court will consider documents identified in paragraph 1 if appropriate to assist the Court in: (1) determining the issues of standing and ripeness; (2) understanding the effect of the United States Forest Service's actions; (3) explaining technical terms or complex subject matter; and (4) facilitating judicial review. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 11/30/2018. (HEG) |
Filing 59 ORDER denying 58 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 11/29/2018. (HEG) |
Filing 50 ORDER denying 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 10/26/2018. (APP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.