Collins v. Fox et al
| Mark William Collins |
| John A Micu, Chad Wright, Morgan Smith, Mark Hilyard, Tim Fox, Chris Miller and Scott Howard |
| 2:2019cv00044 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Kathleen L DeSoto |
| Brian Morris |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE ( 1 pg.) re Filing fee by Mark William Collins. Filing fee of $400 received 9/5/19; receipt number MTX9-1490. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (5 pgs.)) (TAG) |
| Filing 5 Brief/Response to Order re #4 Order filed by Mark William Collins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (TAG) |
| Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number MTX9-1490 (TAG) |
Filing 4
ORDER requiring Plaintiff to file account statement in support of #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis on or before 9/20/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto on 8/29/2019. (MPB) (Copy mailed to Collins on 8/29/2019.) (NOS)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner. Mailed to Collins with docket sheet (TAG) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER (Filing fee $ 400 not paid), filed by Mark William Collins. (Attachments: #1 Appendices/Exhibits, #2 Affidavit, #3 Summons) (TAG) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mark William Collins. Motions referred to Kathleen L. DeSoto. (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
