Sands v. Sally Beauty Holdings
| Denene Sands |
| Sally Beauty Holdings |
| 2:2020cv00040 |
| August 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Brian Morris |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Heidi A. Guttau-Fox for Sally Beauty Holdings. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 10/22/2020. PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 10/7/2020. (MMS)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION Heidi Guttau to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 255 receipt number 0977-2554733.) Christopher R. Hedican appearing for Defendant Sally Beauty Holdings (Attachments: #1 Affidavit - Heidi Guttau in support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Hedican, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sally Beauty Holdings. (Hedican, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Correction: re 7 Disclosure Statement. The filing error relates to: Discovery. See the attached document for a brief description of the error made. (SLR) |
| Filing 7 Disclosure Statement by Denene Sands. (Henke, Lawrence) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #4 Complaint by Sally Beauty Holdings. (Hedican, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 Remark: State Court files provided in electronic form, no hard copies provided. (MMS) |
| Filing 4 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT and DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL (State Court) against Sally Beauty Holdings, filed by Denene Sands. (MMS) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT (State Court) against Sally Beauty Holdings, filed by Denene Sands. (MMS) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE re 1 Notice of Removal, from Montana Second Judicial District Court, Silver Bow County, consisting of (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Motion for Substitution of Judge, #3 Summons Return, #4 Order Inviting Assumption of Jurisdiciton, #5 Motion for Order of Entry of Default, #6 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal) (MMS) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Defendant Sally Beauty Holdings from Montana Second Judicial District Court, Silver Bow County, case number DV-20-233. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of Hedican, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (SLR) |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number 0977-2527230. (SLR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sands v. Sally Beauty Holdings | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sally Beauty Holdings | |
| Represented By: | Christopher R. Hedican |
| Represented By: | Heidi A. Guttau-Fox |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Denene Sands | |
| Represented By: | David L. Vicevich |
| Represented By: | Lawrence E. Henke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
