Akers v. Conover et al
Plaintiff: Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant: J. Conover, Katherine N. Siereveld and Does 1-20
Case Number: 2:2020cv00064
Filed: December 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Presiding Judge: John Johnston
Referring Judge: Brian Morris
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Recruit Counsel by Plaintiff Montgomery Carl Akers. Motions referred to John Johnston. (TAG)
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER LIFTING STAY. The Defendants answer or appropriate motion will be due within 60 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 1/28/2021. Mailed to Akers. (TAG)
January 4, 2021 Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #2 MOTION to Stay filed by Montgomery Carl Akers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (TAG)
December 21, 2020 Filing 7 STATE COURT COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER, filed by Montgomery Carl Akers. (TAG)
December 21, 2020 Filing 6 STATE COURT DOCKET (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents) (TAG)
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 12/17/2020. Mailed to Akers (TAG)
December 14, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #1 Notice of Removal. Mailed to Akers with docket sheet (TAG)
December 11, 2020 Filing 3 Brief/Memorandum in Support re #2 MOTION to Stay filed by J. Conover, Katherine N. Siereveld. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summonses and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Case List, #3 Exhibit C - Cases) (Tanner, Randy)
December 11, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to Stay Randy J. Tanner appearing for Defendants J. Conover, Katherine N. Siereveld Motions referred to John Johnston. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Tanner, Randy)
December 11, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by J. Conover, Katherine N. Siereveld from Montana Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, case number DV-20-1179 B. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (MMS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Akers v. Conover et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Conover
Represented By: Victoria L. Francis
Represented By: Randy J. Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Katherine N. Siereveld
Represented By: Victoria L. Francis
Represented By: Randy J. Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Montgomery Carl Akers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?