Hall et al v. Restore Montana et al
| Julia Hall and James Hall |
| Restore Montana, Restore Franchising, Tod Pierson Work, ABC Corporations 1-10 and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2022cv00042 |
| June 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| John Johnston |
| Brian Morris |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion #6 MOTION to Remand : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Motion Hearing is set for 8/22/2022 at 10:00 AM in Great Falls, MT before Judge Brian Morris. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 8/4/2022. (SLL)
|
| Filing 13 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by James Hall, Julia Hall. (Rabb, Michael) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand filed by Restore Montana. (Lund, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand Defendant Tod Pierson Work's Response in Opposition to Motion to Remand filed by Tod Pierson Work. (Goicoechea, Sean) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand filed by Restore Franchising. (Pagnotta, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Defendant Restore Franchising, LLC has filed an #8 Unopposed Motion forExtension of Time to File a Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted, and Defendants shall have upto and including July 28, 2022, in which to file briefs opposing the pending motion to remand. Docs 6 and 7. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 7/18/2022. (SLR)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 Brief/Memorandum in Support, #6 MOTION to Remand Nicholas John Pagnotta appearing for Defendant Restore Franchising (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Texted of Proposed Order) (Pagnotta, Nicholas) |
| Filing 7 Brief/Memorandum in Support re #6 MOTION to Remand filed by James Hall, Julia Hall. (Rabb, Michael) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand Michael Lloyd Rabb appearing for Plaintiffs James Hall, Julia Hall (Rabb, Michael) |
|
Filing 5
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER; Preliminary Pretrial Statement due by 8/10/2022. Joint Discovery Plan due by 8/10/2022. Statement of Stipulated Facts due by 8/10/2022. Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 8/17/2022 at 03:30 PM before Judge Brian Morris. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 6/28/2022. (TLO)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER; Consent to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge having been either withheld or met with objection, IT IS ORDERED: 1. This case remains assigned to the Honorable Brian Morris, United States District Judge, for all further proceedings and entry of judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to forthwith notify the parties of the making of this order. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 6/28/2022. (TLO)
|
| Magistrate Judge John Johnston no longer assigned to case. (TLO) |
| Filing 3 Service of Consent to Magistrate Judge as Presiding Judge form. Consent/Objection to USMJ Form due by 6/22/2022. (MMS) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint First Amended Complaint by Restore Franchising. (Pagnotta, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Restore Franchising from MT Eighteenth Judicial District, Gallatin County, case number DV-22-387-A., filed by Restore Franchising. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 State Court Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (HEG) |
| Filing fee received: $ 402, receipt number AMTDC-2884548 (HEG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
