Coffee Traders v. Ghost Town Coffee Roasters
| Coffee Traders |
| Ghost Town Coffee Roasters |
| 2:2023cv00035 |
| May 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| John Johnston |
| Brian Morris |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Ghost Town Coffee Roasters. (MMS) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Entry of Default Request for Entry of Default. Brianne C. McClafferty appearing for Plaintiff Coffee Traders. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of B. McClafferty) (McClafferty, Brianne) |
| Terminate Deadlines as to #6 Acknowledgment of Pro Hac by Cnsl Blair. (ACC) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Acknowledgment of Pro Hac Vice Order by Coffee Traders (Blair, Jason) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint for Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition and Jury Demand. Served on Bridget Miotke, Manager of Ghost Town Coffee Roasters on June 7, 2023, filed by Coffee Traders. Ghost Town Coffee Roasters answer due date 6/28/2023. (McClafferty, Brianne) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Jason Blair NOTE: Instructions to request Montana CM/ECF registration through PACER are found #here. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 6/23/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 6/8/2023. (ACC)
|
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Coffee Traders. (McClafferty, Brianne) |
| Filing 4 MOTION Jason P. Blair to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 262 receipt number AMTDC-3079571.). Brianne C. McClafferty appearing for Plaintiff Coffee Traders. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Pro Hac Vice Affadavit for Jason Blair, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Pro Hac Vice Motion) (McClafferty, Brianne) |
| Filing 3 AO 120 Patent and Trademark form transmitted to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (McClafferty, Brianne) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ghost Town Coffee Roasters. Issued summons may be downloaded and printed by counsel for service. (HEG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION AND JURY DEMAND against Defendant, filed by Coffee Traders. (Attachments: #1 Ex A Trademark Register, #2 Ex B Cease-and-desist letter to defendant, #3 Ex C Letter from Plaintiff to Defendant regarding GLACIER, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (HEG) |
| Filing fee received: $ 402, receipt number AMTDC-3078569 (HEG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Coffee Traders v. Ghost Town Coffee Roasters | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Coffee Traders | |
| Represented By: | Brianne C. McClafferty |
| Represented By: | Jason Paul Blair |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ghost Town Coffee Roasters | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
